Photo by Mike Davis

Photo by Mike Davis

Educators in California will be watching closely this year to see whether the so-called "parent trigger" police approved by the land Legislature exactly ii years ago amidst predictions that it would effect radical changes in schools beyond the state, volition have any significant impact on the California education landscape.

So far it has not.

Parents at the nearly 700-educatee Desert Trails Uncomplicated School in Adelanto, halfway between San Bernardino and Barstow, are expected to file a petition today with a long list of demands, from requiring a dress code for teachers, to linking teacher evaluations with student test scores. If those demands aren't met, then they volition file another petition seeking to turn Desert Trails into a charter school.

Just the 2d action of its kind, the Desert Trails petition, the result of organizing past Parent Revolution, a pro-charter advancement organization, is probable to concenter renewed attending to the"parent trigger" law. And so far the law, formally titled "The Parent Empowerment Human action,"  has failed to live up to expectations that information technology would transform the dynamics of education reform across the state, likewise every bit underscored the challenges of how to successfully involve parents in transforming their schools.

It also points to the perils of counting on any one slice of legislation—from California's multi-billion dollar Chiliad-3 class size reduction plan to the federal No Child Left Behind law—to yield definitive results.

The law gives a majority of parents at a maximum of 75 depression-performing schools, as defined by examination scores, the power to sign a petition to force major change in their school, including converting information technology to a charter schoolhouse, replacing teachers or principals, or closing the school altogether.

At the time of the law's passage, so-Senator Gloria Romero, D-Los Angeles, the bill's author, predicted a "whole new era of appointment."  Ben Austin, director of Parent Revolution, declared that "for the offset time anywhere in America, parents accept been empowered and entrusted with the legal right to force dramatic change at their kid's failing schoolhouse."

Until today, parents at McKinley Simple Schoolhouse in Compton were the only ones to even file a "parent trigger" petition, let lonely force a transformation of their school. But that effort, also organized past Parent Revolution, foundered in one of the most high profile didactics controversies in the country last year. The issue ended up in the courts and forced the Land Board of Education to spend an inordinate corporeality of fourth dimension on the effect, including enacting new regulations to implement the police.

The failure to transform McKinley into a charter school triggered a major modify in strategy by Parent Revolution. Equally Austin acknowledged in a Huffington Post commodity late last year:

Parent Trigger is a necessary precondition to kids-get-go change. Simply it is not sufficient. In and of itself, Parent Trigger cannot transform our schools for the 21st Century because of vexing challenges related to policy, partnerships and politics. We must accept with humility that nosotros don't have all the answers when it comes to defining a kids-first policy agenda.

Since Compton, Parent Revolution has organized parents into chapters of a new arrangement Parents Union at 14 schools in the Los Angeles area, said Austin. Parents will lobby on their own for changes to their schoolhouse.

"The theory of alter is simply different," Austin said in an interview with EdSource concluding week. "We assessed what worked, and what didn't."

In Compton, he said, "we were the ones who picked the school, nosotros picked not just the transformation option, but the charter school besides. That is not good plenty. The organizing forcefulness has to come from the parents."

Significantly, Austin said, parents at nearly of the schools his organization is working with are non interested in turning their school into a lease school, but rather want to focus on improving their existing schools, he said.

Notwithstanding, he insisted, the "parent trigger" law has the potential to exist extraordinarily powerful, a tool that parents can wield in negotiations with school authorities. "In the parent trigger context, an empowered body of parents can sit down with their commune, and with their instructor's marriage, and be taken seriously." With the law behind them "they can for all intents and purposes fire the school district if they don't get what they want."

He said most of the parent groups are non actively organizing to transform their schools in the major ways immune under the parent trigger law, merely are aiming for "smaller reforms." Simply he said, "sometimes smaller issues atomic number 82 to bigger issues," and "we are helping parents employ their  power on behalf of their kids" in promoting what Austin calls a "kids first" agenda.

As the Los Angeles Times noted in an editorial, "This is a far cry from what parent trigger advocates had in mind when the constabulary was passed. Then, the idea was that petitions would provide a revolutionary path for quick and radical change."

What is not known is whether parents at other schools around the state are using the parent trigger constabulary to advance reform in their school, or whether Parent Revolution has the field pretty much to itself.

One reason the police has not lit a burn of activism amid parents across the state may be that the deportment permitted nether the law may need to be preceded by a much deeper level of parent involvement, as Marking Warren and Wendy Mapp from the Harvard Graduate School of Educational activity argued in an op-ed article in the San Jose Mercury News:

Nosotros need a way to develop ongoing and meaningful participation past parents if we are serious well-nigh creating and sustaining effective change in public schools in low-income communities. True reform requires a process of participation where parents can learn about educational issues, hold meetings to discuss reform options and comeback plans, and create relationships where they can piece of work together with teachers and administrators to create deep and lasting change in schools.

For a fuller description of the Desert Trails activity, see this article plus photos in the Wall Street Journal.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.